The concept of Resident Evil Outbreak was revolutionary when it first debuted on PS2. It launched when consoles first embraced online play and offered a survival horror experience focused on teamwork.
Unlike the usual Resident Evil formula, it centered on a rotating group of survivors, each with unique strengths and weaknesses.
These characters weren't seasoned operatives but everyday people trying to survive in a doomed city. The game threw teamwork, resource management, and big decisions at you.
click to enlarge
+ 3It oozed boldness, atmosphere, and palpable tension. But the timing couldn't have been worse. Online gaming on consoles was barely functional in the early 2000s. There was no proper matchmaking, no voice chat, and only clunky ways to communicate with teammates.
The game launched with online support in Japan and North America, but Europe didn't receive any. While the concept was ahead of its time, the tech couldn't keep up with unreliable servers and limited communication.
Against all odds, Outbreak found its cult following. Decades later, fans are still hosting private servers just to keep the experience alive. That's not something most games from that era can say. The ongoing modding, writing, and remake pitches all point to one thing: there's a reason it's still relevant.
A remake could resolve the original's flaws while preserving its standout qualities. The RE Engine already lays the technical groundwork. The assets from the recent Resident Evil 2 and 3 remakes could be repurposed to give Raccoon City a more detailed and visually rich remake.
Improving voice chat, AI, cross-platform play, and multiplayer integration would bring the cooperative experience to life like it was meant to be.
Real-time coordination could elevate the tension, especially during those chaotic last moments when everyone's infection meter is ticking up, and the exit's barely in sight.
click to enlarge + 3Expanding on that vision could also mean finally introducing all the content that was cut from the original. Outbreak was meant to have almost 20 scenarios, but the first game launched with just five, and a handful more were included in File #2.
The rest has been scrapped, but there's still a chance to revive, polish, and build on that content for a modern campaign or episodic structure. It's also worth noting how the core gameplay loop remains relevant even now.
Procedural items, different enemies, and unique survivor skills keep things interesting and replayable. The infection system grows over time or with damage, creating tension and discouraging overly cautious playstyles.
These things all work together to make an experience that rewards flexibility and good planning. There's also something to be said about what Outbreak could bring to the modern multiplayer scene.
click to enlarge + 3Horror games these days tend to lean hard into either asymmetrical formats or competitive styles. What's missing is a raw, grounded co-op survival experience where fear builds slowly, resources matter, and cooperation is key, not one that's fast-paced or focused on shooting.
Monetization doesn't even have to get in the way. There are ways to modernize it without compromising the original vibe. Things like skins, scenario packs, and new survivor stories enhance the experience without upsetting the balance.
It's also easy to picture new maps arriving after launch, inspired by lesser-known RE locations like the university, underground labs, or suburbs swarmed by infected.
A remake could fill a gap in the market that provides a PvE-focused experience that honors the series' horror origins and caters to today's co-op preferences. Capcom has already proven it knows how to bring old games back to life.
It's done it with RE2, RE4, and even RE3 to some extent. Outbreak should be next in line, and it's well past due.
For more articles like this, take a look at our Features and Resident Evil page.